Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1451

reference
436-tree-1
name
1451
tree-preservation-order

undefined

436-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040460 50.897801)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040432 50.897798,-1.040433 50.897803,-1.040437 50.897808,-1.040443 50.897812,-1.040451 50.897815,-1.040460 50.897816,-1.040477 50.897813,-1.040483 50.897809,-1.040487 50.897804,-1.040489 50.897798,-1.040483 50.897788,-1.040477 50.897783,-1.040461 50.897780,-1.040444 50.897783,-1.040437 50.897787,-1.040433 50.897792,-1.040432 50.897798)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL